I do love PeterST's NOS DAC project I think that's the future. I had read through every topic Peter wrote for dummies and newbies, but still am not enlightened.īoth players clicks between tracks, hqplayer less so. same error message when I tried to play 96K tracks I had to redefine DAC to be 96K/24. I specified dac requires 192/24 but keep getting error when I tried to 4x upsample redbook CD to 88.2K. The relationship between upsampling target and DAC requirement is very confusing. The xxhiend UI is better but not by much. Effect of changing volume is also longer in xxhiend, this is dangerous because I over cranked the volume a couple of times. I believe thats true from the latency time which also depends on whether it is 44.1KHz or 192K. I understand from PeterSt's write up that he fully processes the whole track before playing. HDplayer is much faster in putting a track into play. I like every respect of HQ sound over that of xxhiend: details, sound stage, imaging, space, dynamics, bass extension and on and on. I switched to xxhiend again earlier today and could not wait to return to HQPlayer. HQplayer sounds much better in my system. Both are very good, truly heads and shoulders above foobar, winamp etc. I have been listening to these two players for days now.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |